Jump to content

True Neutral: Difference between revisions

From Marillia
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
As it sits neutral with regards to law and chaos, True Neutral is willing to work within power structures and systems of authority to achieve its end, but it is also willing to operate outside of them. It does not seek to undermine them.
As it sits neutral with regards to law and chaos, True Neutral is willing to work within power structures and systems of authority to achieve its end, but it is also willing to operate outside of them. It does not seek to undermine them.


Its neutrality with regards to good and evil is where things get a bit confusing, at least for me. Personally, I see Lawful Neutral as the conflation of order with good, and Chaotic Neutral as the conflation of freedom with good. Thus, I see True Neutral as the ''conflation of operability with power structures and outside of them with good''.
Its neutrality with regards to good and evil is where things get a bit confusing, at least for me. Personally, I see Lawful Neutral as the conflation of order with good, and Chaotic Neutral as the conflation of freedom with good. Thus, I see True Neutral as the ''conflation of operability inside and outside of power structures with good''.
 
== Meta examples ==
 
The only example of True Neutral I can think of is (Captain) Jack Sparrow. Is he a good guy? No, he does some wicked things. Is he a bad guy? Well, he does a surprising number of good things. He's certainly not Lawful Neutral, but I don't think he's Chaotic Neutral, either: he is perfectly willing to strike a deal with the navy, the East India Company, and the crown to get what he wants. The fact that I can't imagine him ''being unwilling to cooperate with authority to achieve his ends'' indicates to me that he's True Neutral, not Chaotic Neutral. Now contrast that with someone like Deadpool, whom I believe is certainly Chaotic Neutral.


{{Alignment}}
{{Alignment}}

Latest revision as of 14:26, 15 July 2025

True Neutral is a rare alignment that sits in between the law–chaos and good–evil axes.

As it sits neutral with regards to law and chaos, True Neutral is willing to work within power structures and systems of authority to achieve its end, but it is also willing to operate outside of them. It does not seek to undermine them.

Its neutrality with regards to good and evil is where things get a bit confusing, at least for me. Personally, I see Lawful Neutral as the conflation of order with good, and Chaotic Neutral as the conflation of freedom with good. Thus, I see True Neutral as the conflation of operability inside and outside of power structures with good.

Meta examples

The only example of True Neutral I can think of is (Captain) Jack Sparrow. Is he a good guy? No, he does some wicked things. Is he a bad guy? Well, he does a surprising number of good things. He's certainly not Lawful Neutral, but I don't think he's Chaotic Neutral, either: he is perfectly willing to strike a deal with the navy, the East India Company, and the crown to get what he wants. The fact that I can't imagine him being unwilling to cooperate with authority to achieve his ends indicates to me that he's True Neutral, not Chaotic Neutral. Now contrast that with someone like Deadpool, whom I believe is certainly Chaotic Neutral.

Alignment
Law Neutral Chaos
Good Lawful Good Neutral Good Chaotic Good
Neutral Lawful Neutral True Neutral Chaotic Neutral
Evil Lawful Evil Neutral Evil Chaotic Evil